Two weeks after graduating from college, I began the first chapter of my New York City life with my first real job, my first apartment, and a certain naivete about the world that awaited me. On one memorable evening, my friends and I met {over dinner, of course} and engaged in what became one of the most passion-filled, dynamic conversations, to date. The conversation stemmed from Maureen Dowd's article "
What's a Modern Girl to Do?" While Dowd goes through the sometimes paradoxical personas of the modern day woman {circa 2005}, our discussion steered right to "Can women really have it all?" A hot topic then, a hot topic now.
Anne Marie Slaughter's article "
Why Women Still Can't Have It All" certainly has received its share of press recently. If you have not read it, it promises to incite all sorts of beliefs, judgments, and even emotions. As a woman who decided not to pursue a career in medicine due to the balance {or lack thereof} between professional and personal life, I recognize the challenges inherent in wearing multiple hats - mom, wife, {fill in the} ______. In reading and discussing this topic, I have seen conversations driven directly to the climax - women can't have it all - without stopping at what seems to be fundamental points to consider.
First, what do we mean by "have it all?" I imagine that this varies quite a bit from person to person. While my having it all includes {to name just a few} being able to walk to work and maintaining a reasonable schedule so that I can prepare and share dinner with my husband, surely, many of you have different ideals and expectations. Most often though, the topic discussion veers right to the difficult divide that exists between family responsibilities and professional responsibilities. While understandable considering the enormity of both, I think we are failing to acknowledge that for some, parenting is not part of having it all. While I hope to be a parent {to more than a pup} one day, I think that Slaughter's proposals to change the culture of the workplace do not take into account the power of personal choices. Should a woman raising a family be afforded more flexibility than a woman who chooses to spend her personal time volunteering? If such a woman instead chooses to invest her time in her career rather than in having a family, should she not be valued more by her company than her counterpart? Each of us has choices - the lucky ones have more options from which to choose. If we want to be wives, mothers, and professionals, we can be, but we also must be realistic about the compromises intrinsic to each choice we make.
While Slaughter focuses her article on women {as do many other authors}, men are not excluded {or should not be}. Can men have it all? Slaughter comments, "But almost all {women} assumed and accepted that they would have to make compromises that the men in their lives were far less likely to have to make." Is it that men are not exposed to the same sorts of compromises? Quite to the contrary, I think that the men alluded to in these types of articles have chosen to put their careers first and, knowingly or not, have accepted the concessions necessary to succeed.
Quite frankly, I have pared down what is a complicated and multi-layered issue to a comparatively short blog post. As the namesake implies, my hope with this blog is to share something that you will savor - whether that is as small as a jar of honey or as robust as the hot-button issue of having it all. Personally, I think that there is a little something to savor in most {or at least many} of the choices we make.